A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design operates at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a company director respectively, seek to construct their relatives house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where progress pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of set up people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their scheduling authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore regions are topic to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly inside of a delicate coastal setting including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which is partially crafted, is in the correct placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal preparing disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable efforts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In line with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has given that turn into emblematic of your depth of your dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they ended up meant to Obtain Visible evidence from the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the drinking water in the course of extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the location turned Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps ended up cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been coated intimately with the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as audience sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further more submissions on whether interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute during the lawful timeline.
With the core on the dispute can be a disagreement over boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling documents, maps, and ailments attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair merely looking to create a loved ones property in accordance While using the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that all is effective have already been performed depending on Expert advice and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea all through a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for any problem that many observers see as significantly widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Earlier been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical reality from the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme approach.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom must establish whether the wall as developed complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment into a Unique Spot of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and preparing situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Reside alongside each other extended following the legal expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building functions at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong outside of that tackle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when essential issues including environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In Rene Collier and Paul Feely the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of organic magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Irrespective of whether it is going to eventually be altered, removed, or concluded as prepared will depend on the court’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.